B. Quinn, The new American pictures out of John Light, step one577-1590 (dos vols
dos. William Camden, Historie . (London, 1630), III, pp. 61-62; Jerome E. Brooks, Tobacco: its Records Portrayed . from the Library out of George Arents (5 vols., New york, 1937-52), We, pp je luvfree zdarma. 46-49; II, pp. 156-158; R. N. Salaman, The history and Public Dictate of Potato (Cambridge, 1949), pp. 83-96; Quinn, Roanoke Voyages , I, pp. 344-348.
BIGGES, WALTER. An excellent Summarie and you can Correct Commentary out-of Sir Frances [sic] Drakes Western Indian Trip. (First-line away from title and a few headlines cut.) Which have woodcut printer’s mark out-of Richard Occupation on the identity. 4 simply leaves, 37 (1) pp., step one empty leaf. Short quarto. Morocco.
The next ENGLISH Version, authored a similar 12 months because the first. The current Roger Ward edition is apparently shorter notorious than the Richard Occupation edition (STC 3056) which preceded it a comparable seasons–understand the earlier in the day amount. STC-Bishop-Ramage locate just cuatro copies of the Ward version since the up against eleven of your own Occupation. The current content contains the leaf before the label, blank with the exception of new trademark-mark « A good, » plus the blank leaf in the bottom.
F. » is sent to ocean into February 4, 1589, with regards to reconnoitering the fresh Iberian shores when preparing for the brand new Drake-Norris expedition off 1589
STC 3057; Sabin 20841; Chapel 136 (note); Waters (ed.), True and you may Perfecte Newes . Syr Frauncis Drake , pp. 53-70; Quinn, ed., The fresh new Roanoke Voyages , We, pp. 32-35.
« T. He offers development of your own fate of your own Invincible Armada away from the previous season: « So when concerning history Fleete, [a marchant of Lisbone] sayth, compared to all the ships and you can carvels of your Foreign-language Fleete you will find return home however, 9 and you will thirtie. but most of all boys one emerged home passed away immediatly during the its obtaining. Plus the Duke of Medina was banished new Legal for ever. » It second outline is fairly not the case–King Philip didn’t blame the new Duke toward failure away from this new Armada campaign. The guy together with provides particulars of an excellent naval step away from Lisbon inside and therefore a good Greek ship packed with wine regarding Crete was grabbed, and you will predicts high profits to the upcoming assault.
(WINGFIELD, ANTHONY). A genuine Coppie out-of a commentary compiled by a guy, employed in the brand new late Trip out-of Spaine and Portingale. dos simply leaves, 58 pp., step 1 blank leaf. (Pp. 27-29 without having, given from inside the photostat.) Woodcut vignette toward identity. Quick quarto. Dated forums, leather straight back.
Earliest Version, Very first Topic. Wingfield’s story is the most outlined membership extant of one’s 1589 attack towards the The country of spain commanded by Sir Francis Drake and you may Sir John Norreys (Norris), and that sailed from Plymouth into the April 17, 1589, and you will came back late inside the Summer. However, an enthusiastic unnumbered later listing offers Wingfield due to the fact author. 1
Brand new expedition unsuccessful in its principal goal, the fresh new raising regarding good rebellion into the Portugal against King Philip II out of Spain, and the enthroning from Dom Antonio, the final male offshoot of your own Aviz dynasty, when you look at the Philip’s put. It did some injury to Spanish naval shipment on Corunna, also specific traces of your own Armada of your past 12 months; as well as over sixty boats laden up with corn and you will naval supplies which the newest English considered contraband had been pulled near Lisbon in the Hanse.
In the STC the book was improperly ascribed to King Elizabeth’s favorite, Robert Devereux, Earl out of Essex, which participated in the new trip–far resistant to the Queen’s commonly–while the a volunteer
Two issues of this work are extant; signature E (pp. 25-32), which relates events of the attack upon Lisbon, in some copies (including this one) contains a passage in praise of the Earl of Essex on p. 26 (E
1 verso). As Queen Elizabeth was highly displeased with the Earl’s running off on this voyage against her orders, it is perhaps likely that the issue with the passage is the earlier of the two.